Comparisons
iBTC vs. the Competition: A Technical Edge
iBTC stands out in the crowded wrapped Bitcoin space, outpacing wBTC, Babylon, and tBTC with its bridgeless, trust-minimized design. Below, we compare key features, highlighting iBTC’s superiority for developers and investors alike.
iBTC vs. wBTC
Feature
iBTC
wBTC
Custody Model
Non-custodial (PSBT-based, multisig)
Centralized (BitGo-controlled)
Minting Process
Self-wrap by merchants/attestors
BitGo mints all wBTC
Transparency
Chainlink PoR, on-chain audits
Third-party audit reports
Redemption
30-60 min via PSBT
3-12 hours via BitGo
Why iBTC Wins: Eliminates custody risk with decentralized control and faster redemption.
iBTC vs. Babylon
Feature
iBTC
Babylon
Yield Model
User-driven DeFi (5%-20%)
Cosmos-based staking
Custody
User-controlled PSBTs
Protocol-determined staking
Multi-Chain
Ethereum, L2s, XRPL
Limited to Cosmos ecosystem
Why iBTC Wins: Offers broader DeFi access and avoids Cosmos’ unsustainable yield concerns.
iBTC vs. tBTC
Feature
iBTC
tBTC
Minting
PSBT-based, institution-led
Threshold cryptographic minting
Custody
Self-managed, no central pool
Decentralized but pooled signers
Redemption
Direct PSBT redemption
Relies on third-party signers
Why iBTC Wins: Direct redemption and no pooled risk make iBTC more secure and efficient.
Last updated